DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF SAFE WATER USING NON-CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES

Authors

  • Jorge Emilio Almazán Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (INIQUI - CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Salta - Argentina
  • Enzo Marcelo Corte Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (INIQUI - CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Salta - Argentina
  • Miguel Cervantes Schamun Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (INIQUI - CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Salta - Argentina
  • Dolores Gutiérrez Cacciabue Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (INIQUI - CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Salta - Argentina
  • Verónica Beatriz Rajal Instituto de Investigaciones para la Industria Química - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (INIQUI - CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Salta - Argentina

Keywords:

Safe water, natural clarifiers, ultrafiltration

Abstract

In the province of Salta, the rural population has expanded to places without access to safe water for consumption, resulting in an increase in diseases related to the consumption of contaminated water. To address this problem, a modular system was designed to obtain safe water using a clarification process with natural clarifiers and disinfection through ultrafiltration. Different alternatives of natural clarifiers were evaluated, including powder of prickly pear cactus mucilage (MT), banana pulp powder (PB) and potato residue powder (RP). MT proved to be the most efficient in removing turbidity, achieving a removal of 97%, while PB and RP obtained 85% and 82% respectively. Different options for obtaining MT were economically valued, including outsourcing the drying and grinding of the mucilage or doing it on their own, as well as cultivating the raw material or buying it. It was more profitable to outsource the drying and grinding of the mucilage and cultivate the raw material. The unit costs of production of the equipment were determined and the cost of the liter of safe water produced was compared with other alternatives, taking into account the costs of the natural clarifier, the daily cleaning costs of the equipment and the monthly replacement of ultrafiltration cartridges. The price of the liter of safe water obtained with the system and using the chosen natural clarifier was 0.10 USD/L, proving competitive compared to different alternatives in the market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-05-15

How to Cite

Almazán, J. E., Corte, E. M., Cervantes Schamun, M., Gutiérrez Cacciabue, D., & Rajal, V. B. (2024). DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF SAFE WATER USING NON-CONVENTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES. AJEA (Proceedings of UTN Academic Conferences and Events), (AJEA 30). Retrieved from https://rtyc.utn.edu.ar/index.php/ajea/article/view/1422

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Proceedings - Environment and Sustainability